Sunday, January 13, 2008

Turning from God's Middlemen

Mike Huckabee is splitting evangelicals along caste lines.

Check it:
Much of the national leadership of the Christian conservative movement has turned a cold shoulder to the Republican presidential campaign of Mike Huckabee, wary of his populist approach to economic issues and his criticism of the Bush administration’s foreign policy. But that has only fired up Brett and Alex Harris.
This is what good populism should do, something that John Edwards — more because of his place on the political spectrum than because of his ability as a politician or his views — never has. Mike Huckabee is connecting on a deep, broad level with a large group of people who feel their leaders' views falling out of step with their own.

It shows the extent to which the Pat Robertsons of the world were able to piggyback pro-business conservatism atop evangelical faith and sell the whole thing to millions of conservative Christians as a set of holistic political and moral principles. A complete worldview basically, not simply an ethics or a politics. Whether that exact worldview was shared by the entirety of the religious right when it was winning elections for Reagan and Bush 2 or if it was just the best fit at the time can never be clear, but Huckabee has certainly exposed a rift now, one that cuts along caste lines.

(I say "caste" because the leaders of the religious/political right — the remnants of the Christian Coalition/Moral Majority —aren't just all rich white men, putting them in an economic class above their followers. They've also set themselves up as God's middlemen, making themselves the high priests, the law-givers.)

What Huckabee has given middleclass, middle-of-the-road conservative believers is a third way between liberals and the pro-God/pro-business of their presumptive demagogues. That doesn't make Huck's way the right way and it doesn't make him the right candidate (he scares me to death), but we live in a deeply pluralistic society whose political system masks the diversity of its people. The more candidates like Huckabee and Ron Paul (and Edwards, though he hasn't found the cleavage point the other two have) that can ignite people's passion against what Edwards somewhat tritely calls the status quo, the better it is for America.

... and also for Democrats, if one of these wedge candidates ends up running as an independent.

2 Comments:

At 2:31 PM, Blogger mikesheffler said...

This 'third way' business (and not in the Clinton sense) is an important point, I think. With only two viable parties, it's inevitable that interest groups will be lumped together in unusual ways in order to fit under one of the two big tents. However, I have always found the groupings of the Republican party particularly strange, and have often wondered not only how a new (but still Republican) tent could be erected from the various interest groups, but who could be the person to do it. I don't think Huckabee's the guy either (being crazy is kind of a liability in a presidential election -- although not as big of a liability as it should be), but it's interesting to see someone try. Good points.

 
At 12:59 PM, Blogger Don Sheffler said...

If (when) he fails to get the Republican nomination, Huckabee does appear to have a future in front of the camera if he wants it.

I caught his appearance on SNL Weekend Update, and I was surprised at his comedic timing, along with a willingness to make fun of himself.

As far as a Republican big tent, the primaries for both parties end up creating a group by default. Most of the Republicans, whether evangelical meddlers or libertarian little-gubmenters or fiscal conservatives, they eventually have to line up behind their final candidate.

This time it just happens to be behind a guy they all consider to be a wild-eyed leftist. Kind of funny. But he's their man this year.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home